Fra Reuters – læs hele artiklen her
Otmar Issing, a founding member of the executive board of the European Central Bank, gave an extraordinary interview to a finance journal in which he said “the house of cards will collapse” when asked about the future of the ECB and the euro.
The statement is surprising because Issing is widely regarded as the architect of the euro. He is a former board member of the Deutsche Bundesbank who joined the ECB in 1998 specifically to create the EU currency.
He has previously argued that the euro is worth saving but that some nations (Greece, most obviously) may have to leave the eurozone to ensure its survival. So his more recent comments are more harsh than he has been in the past.
Issing’s statement appeared in Central Banking journal, as part of a lengthy discussion about the independence of the ECB. He was asked whether the central bank was too cooperative with the politicians and governments who rely on it, and whether it had bought too much low-quality debt in its efforts to underpin the European economy. He argued that the ECB’s independence was reducedbecause it was bending too far to meet the demands of governments who are afraid of systemic banking collapses or defaults:
“But the current situation has emerged as part of a slippery slope that the ECB has been drawn down, making it ‘the only game in town’. There is no easy way for it to get out. And the exit will become increasingly difficult, while at the same time the ECB is undermining its role as an independent central bank. Take the May 2010 decision [about the Greek debt crisis].
“It was clear over the weekend that if nothing happened by Monday, there might be turmoil in financial markets. It was obvious Greece could not meet its payments. Finance ministers were unable to deliver a solution. So the ECB was put in a lose-lose situation. By not intervening in the market, the ECB was at risk of being held responsible for a market collapse. But by intervening, it would violate its mandate by selectively buying government bonds – its actions would be a substitute for fiscal policy. The ECB had respectable arguments to intervene.
“But it turned out that the ‘ECB had crossed the Rubicon.’ Of course, Julius Caesar had to go on and conquer Rome. But there was no need for the ECB to say that in the future in the same situation, it would act in a similar manner. It could have been made clear that this was a once-only event and would never happen again. Otherwise, it is a slippery road.”
He was then asked, “How long can everything keep going before something gives? The politicians do not want to take action … Nobody with a surplus really wants to share fiscal burdens. So what happens next?” Issing replied:
“Realistically, it will be a case of muddling through, struggling from one crisis to the next one. It is difficult to forecast how long this will continue for, but it cannot go on endlessly. Governments will pile up more debt – and then one day, the house of cards will collapse.”
