I et forskningspapir med titlen ”Rethinking AI Regulation” hedder det, at ”in the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, our legal frameworks face the challenge not only to keep pace, but also to propel the best, most socially valuable technologies forward. While numerous bills and regulations aim to restrict AI use and mitigate risks, regulation and public debates have largely neglected a crucial aspect: the potential need to mandate AI deployment when it demonstrably outperforms human decision-making. The Paradox of AI Regulation: Current regulatory trends, exemplified by the EU AI Act and various US federal and state bills, focus heavily on limiting AI applications deemed ‘high-risk.’ This approach, generally well-intentioned, too often fails to consider the comparative advantages of AI over human decision-making. Indeed, we at times are witnessing a paradox: the higher the stakes, the more likely legislative proposals are to insist on human intervention and slow the growth of technology, even when evidence suggests AI could be safer and more effective.”
Morten W. Langer
