Annonce

Log ud Log ind
Log ud Log ind
Ledelse

Er det risikofuldt at investere i selskaber uden intern revision

Økonomisk ugebrev

fredag 23. oktober 2015 kl. 11:07

Er det risikofuldt – eller endda risikabelt – at investere i selskaber uden intern revision: In a blog earlier this year, I sounded an alarm about the dangers of investing in companies with no internal audit function. Ultimately, the goal was to raise awareness of the risks that accompany the absence of internal audit in publicly traded companies. That effort took an important step forward last week when The IIA formally recommended to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that all publicly traded companies be required to have an internal audit function. There have been a number of high-profile financial and corporate governance scandals of late that should hammer home the absolutely necessity of good corporate governance, and it should go without saying that internal audit adds value to that process by providing effective oversight of the control environment. Yet, there are many enterprises — large and small — that continue to operate without internal audit. The IIA’s letter to the SEC outlines the case for internal audit to serve as a foundation for — if not a catalyst to — restoring investor confidence. Indeed, the presence of an effective internal audit function signals unequivocally management’s and the board’s support of strong and effective risk management, internal control, and governance. When a publicly traded company has no internal audit function, one must ask: Who is providing the independent and objective assurance and insight the board needs to determine how well risk and the mitigating controls are being managed? This may sound self-serving, but if it is only management that provides that assurance, the board may be operating at a disadvantage. We have seen too many recent examples of management’s influence contributing to a toxic corporate culture that can destroy shareholder value. Neither boards nor the shareholders they serve can afford to rely on a single lens when assessing how well risks are being managed or controls are being designed and implemented in companies in which they have a vested interest.

Tilmeld dig vores gratis nyhedsbrev
ØU Bestyrelsesguiden

Få de vigtigste nyheder om praktisk bestyrelsesarbejde, ledelse og strategi i SMV.
Udkommer hver onsdag.

Jeg giver samtykke til, at I sender mig mails med de seneste historier fra Økonomisk Ugebrev. Lejlighedsvis må I gerne sende mig gode tilbud og information om events. Samtidig accepterer jeg ØU’s Privatlivspolitik.

Du kan til enhver tid afmelde dig med et enkelt klik.

[postviewcount]

Jobannoncer

Finance/Business Controller til Anzet A/S
Region Sjælland
Spændende og alsidig stilling som økonomi- og administrationschef
Region Hovedstaden
Forbrugerrådet Tænk søger en ny direktør
Region Hovedstaden
INSTITUTLEDER PÅ AAU BUSINESS SCHOOL – Aalborg Universitet
Region Nordjylland
Financial Controller til Process Integration ApS
Region Midt

Mere fra ØU Ledelse

Log ind

Har du ikke allerede en bruger? Opret dig her.

FÅ VORES STORE NYTÅRSUDGAVE AF FORMUE

Her er de 10 bedste aktier i 2022

Tilbuddet udløber om:
dage
timer
min.
sek.

Analyse af og prognoser for Fixed Income (statsrenter og realkreditrenter)

Direkte adgang til opdaterede analyser fra toneangivende finanshuse:

Goldman Sachs

Fidelity

Danske Bank

Morgan Stanley

ABN Amro

Jyske Bank

UBS

SEB

Natixis

Handelsbanken

Merril Lynch 

Direkte adgang til realkreditinstitutternes renteprognoser:

Nykredit

Realkredit Danmark

Nordea

Analyse og prognoser for kort rente, samt for centralbankernes politikker

Links:

RBC

Capital Economics

Yardeni – Central Bank Balance Sheet 

Investing.com: FED Watch Monitor Tool

Nordea

Scotiabank