Annonce

Log ud Log ind
Log ud Log ind

Europæere frygter, at offentlige udgifter vil koste dem personligt

Oscar M. Stefansen

torsdag 26. februar 2026 kl. 10:31

Resume af teksten:

Regeringerne i Europa planlægger at øge udgifterne til forsvar og infrastruktur, hvilket har ført til bekymring blandt forbrugerne om deres personlige økonomiske fordele. En undersøgelse fra ING viser, at færre end en tredjedel af de adspurgte forventer positive effekter, mens næsten tre fjerdedele frygter negative konsekvenser som inflation og skatteforhøjelser. Økonomer mener, at disse investeringer vil øge BNP og stimulere økonomien, men undersøgelsen viser, at højere finansiel forståelse ofte medfører større skepsis over for disse forventninger. Mange respondenter forudser, at de vil mærke finansielle konsekvenser gennem prisstigning og eventuelle fremtidige skatteforhøjelser, på trods af forsikringer om gældsfinansierede udgifter. For at opretholde tilliden er det afgørende for beslutningstagere at forstå og adressere forbrugernes bekymringer.

Fra ING:

As governments increase spending on defence and infrastructure, many European consumers are asking: “What’s in it for me?” Our latest ING Consumer Research survey suggests many are sceptical about the benefits and, in fact, fear negative spillovers for their personal finances

Defence spending is expected to increase and provide a boost to GDP across Europe

Defence spending is expected to increase and provide a boost to GDP across Europe

Many don’t expect to profit from higher spending

Across Europe, governments are preparing to spend more money on defence in response to recent geopolitical changes. European NATO countries have agreed to boost defence spending to 5% of GDP, about a third of which can be allocated to related infrastructure projects. Lawmakers are moving to make room for these expenditures through exemptions from the EU stability pact. In early 2025, Germany restructured its constitutional debt brake. Europe’s largest economy can now issue significantly more debt to fund spending on defence and infrastructure. And there’s also hope that the looming 2026 deadline will accelerate disbursements from the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility.

Economists believe that spending programmes like these will boost GDP and help breathe new life into economies that, in some cases, are still struggling to reach their pre-pandemic output levels. But what do people think – will any of that money reach their pockets?

ING Consumer Research surveyed people in six European countries – Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Spain – about how extra government spending on defence and infrastructure might impact them. On average, less than a third of respondents are willing to agree with at least one of three statements suggesting these expenditures will benefit their finances. By contrast, almost three quarters believe extra government spending will hurt their finances via inflation, higher taxes or cuts elsewhere.

Pessimism reigns supreme

Percentage of respondents expecting either a positive or negative impact on their personal financial situation from increased government spending on defence and infrastructure

- Source: ING Consumer Research

Source: ING Consumer Research

It comes as no surprise that relatively few respondents expect to profit from effects directly linked to the industries receiving the additional funding; obviously, not everyone works in defence or infrastructure or is invested in these sectors.

But even the idea that this spending could fuel a wider economic recovery which would benefit individuals is met with scepticism – less than a quarter of respondents expect their finances to improve.

Consumers don’t expect defence and infrastructure spending to reach their own pockets

“Across Europe, governments are planning to spend more money on defence and, in some cases, infrastructure. To what extent do you believe these additional government expenditures will affect your own financial situation?”

- Source: ING Consumer Research

Source: ING Consumer Research

Those with more financial knowledge are less likely to expect personal gains

Our survey also included five questions designed to assess participants’ grasp of basic financial concepts. You can read more about the results from these questions in my colleague Alissa Lefebre’s article . We also wanted to know whether people with varying levels of financial knowledge view the effects of government spending differently.

While economists like ourselves believe that these spending measures are Europe’s best bet to revive a slumping economy, the survey numbers indicate that with greater financial knowledge, respondents are actually less likely to subscribe to this view – or at least to assume that they would stand to profit. The better the results from the questions on financial knowledge, the lower the agreement and the higher the disagreement with the corresponding statement. At least one of these two correlations can be observed in all surveyed countries.

The more people know, the more they disagree with the experts

“My own financial situation will benefit because these expenditures will stimulate the overall economy”. Agreement/disagreement by results from financial knowledge questions

Difference to 100 percent: “Neither agree nor disagree”; “Low” indicates 0 or 1 correct answers out of 5 questions, “Med” indicates 2 or 3 correct answers, “High” indicates 4 or 5 correct answers. - Source: ING Consumer Research

Difference to 100 percent: “Neither agree nor disagree”; “Low” indicates 0 or 1 correct answers out of 5 questions, “Med” indicates 2 or 3 correct answers, “High” indicates 4 or 5 correct answers.

Source: ING Consumer Research

Fear outweighs hope: concerns over inflation and tax hikes dominate

While many are hard-pressed to see how their own financial situation might improve from increased government spending on defence and infrastructure, it seems rather easy for them to imagine how they might suffer from it. Half of respondents fear that inflation fuelled by these spending measures will leave them worse off.

And even though programmes like the ones in Germany are designed to be debt-funded and thus shouldn’t need to be paid for through higher taxes up front, that is exactly what more than 60% are wary of. A somewhat smaller share, 38%, also fear that increased spending on defence and infrastructure will lead to budget cuts elsewhere from which they might suffer – a figure that is still 15 percentage points higher than the highest level of agreement with any statement suggesting positive effects.

Consumers believe today’s expenditures are tomorrow’s tax hikes

“Across Europe, governments are planning to spend more money on defence and, in some cases, infrastructure. To what extent do you believe these additional government expenditures will affect your own financial situation?”

- Source: ING Consumer Research

Source: ING Consumer Research

Understanding and addressing concerns is key to maintaining trust

In summary, while economists think that increased defence and infrastructure spending will stimulate economic growth, most consumers remain sceptical about the benefits of such measures. The survey results also suggest that individuals with higher financial literacy are not more likely to agree with the experts, but are in fact less likely to do so.

This widespread apprehension highlights a disconnect between expert economic optimism and public sentiment. As policymakers consider the long-term implications of these expenditures, understanding and addressing the underlying fears among consumers will be crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring effective communication about fiscal policy decisions.

Hurtige nyheder er stadig i beta-fasen, og fejl kan derfor forekomme.

Få dagens vigtigste
økonominyheder hver dag kl. 12

Bliv opdateret på aktiemarkedets bevægelser, skarpe indsigter
og nyeste tendenser fra Økonomisk Ugebrev – helt gratis.

Jeg giver samtykke til, at I sender mig mails med de seneste historier fra Økonomisk Ugebrev.  Lejlighedsvis må I gerne sende mig gode tilbud og information om events. Samtidig accepterer jeg ØU’s Privatlivspolitik. Du kan til enhver tid afmelde dig med et enkelt klik.

[postviewcount]

Jobannoncer

Chief Financial & Operating Officer (COO/CFO) for Centre for Ancient Environmental Genomics
Region Hovedstaden
Investeringsrådgiver til Hovedsædet – Private Banking
Region Midtjylland
Udløber snart
Økonomimedarbejder
Region Syddanmark
Økonomikonsulent med indsigt i socialområdet
Økonomikonsulent
Region Hovedstaden
Økonomichef til Danmarks førende online havecenter
Økonomichef
Region Midtjylland
Udløber snart
Direktør for Økonomirådgivningen
Region Nordjylland

Log ind

Har du ikke allerede en bruger? Opret dig her.

FÅ VORES STORE NYTÅRSUDGAVE AF FORMUE

Her er de 10 bedste aktier i 2022

Tilbuddet udløber om:
dage
timer
min.
sek.

Analyse af og prognoser for Fixed Income (statsrenter og realkreditrenter)

Direkte adgang til opdaterede analyser fra toneangivende finanshuse:

Goldman Sachs

Fidelity

Danske Bank

Morgan Stanley

ABN Amro

Jyske Bank

UBS

SEB

Natixis

Handelsbanken

Merril Lynch 

Direkte adgang til realkreditinstitutternes renteprognoser:

Nykredit

Realkredit Danmark

Nordea

Analyse og prognoser for kort rente, samt for centralbankernes politikker

Links:

RBC

Capital Economics

Yardeni – Central Bank Balance Sheet 

Investing.com: FED Watch Monitor Tool

Nordea

Scotiabank