Formue

FED’s Base effekt-forklaring på inflationen holder ikke vand

Morten W. Langer

mandag 03. maj 2021 kl. 20:36

By Joseph Carson, former chief economist of Alliance Bernstein

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has played down the current runup in inflation, arguing it is associated with the reopening of the economy. And as the low inflation readings of one year ago drop out, the twelve-month calculation (i.e., the so-called base effect) of reported inflation is likely to move up in the coming months.

Yet, Mr. Powell’s “base effect” inflation argument is nonsense. For the “base effect” argument to be correct, the twelve-month reading of reported inflation should be markedly lower when the economy was closed than what occurred before the pandemic. But that’s not the case.

Last week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that the twelve-month change ending in March 2021 in the core personal consumption index (the Fed’s preferred price index) was 1.83%. That compares to the 1.87% reading for the year ending in February 2020 and 1.7% for the year before that.

The 1.83% reading for twelve months ending March 2021 essentially matches the average inflation rate of the two prior years. And that 12 month period includes the three months (April to June) when the economy was closed, and GDP plunged a record 31% annualized. How could there be a “base effect” on reported inflation when the base year has the same inflation rate as it did before the pandemic?

Mr. Powell’s “base effect” inflation argument has not been questioned or challenged by analysts or reporters. Regardless of that, investors need to ignore the Fed’s rhetoric and treat upcoming price increases as “new” inflation.

As nonsensical as the explanation for the uptick in inflation, so too is the remedy. Demand has always been the primary force behind broad inflation cycles. Yet, Mr. Powell argues that product price inflation will ease once manufacturers increase output and eliminate “supply bottlenecks,” and home inflation will slow once builders build more homes.

It’s hard to see how more supply (or growth) will slow inflation anytime soon. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (Freddie Mac) estimates that the US needs almost 4 million new homes to meet demand. That could take two to three years. Also, it’s hard to see how increasing product output will solve the inflation problem. The supply-side argument solution; fight inflation with more demand and more commodity inflation.

The Fed’s mantra has always been “inflation is everywhere and always a monetary phenomenon.” But nowhere in Mr. Powell’s statements or comments do you find any monetary policy role for increased inflation or any responsibility for containment. Investors forewarned.

Del på facebook
Del på twitter
Del på linkedin
Del på email
Del på print

[postviewcount]

Jobannoncer

SEGES søger specialist i ejendomsbeskatning
Aarhus
31-05-2021
Forsyningstilsynet søger analytisk økonom til udvikling, overvågning og regulering af elmarkederne
Frederiksværk
25-05-2021
SEGES søger Skattespecialist
Aarhus
31-05-2021
Compliance Officer til Compliance i Sydbank
Aabenraa
16-05-2021
Obligationsanalytiker til Sydbank i Aabenraa
Aabenraa
21-05-2021
Sparekassen Kronjylland søger virksomhedsanalytiker
Randers
17-05-2021
Landbrug & Fødevarer søger CHEFØKONOM
København
20-05-2021
Kreditmedarbejder til bankens hovedkontor i Ringkøbing
Ringkøbing
31-05-2021
Orifarm Group A/S søger Finance Process Specialist
Odense
31-05-2021
ATP søger leder med juridiske kompetencer til Udbetaling Danmark & helhedsorienteret kontrol
Hillerød
09-05-2021
SAGRO søger dygtig og topmotiveret skatte- og selskabsspecialist
Holstebro, Herning, Billund, Esbjerg
31-05-2021
Kreditanalytiker med fokus på creditscore til Sparekassen Kronjylland
Randers
17-05-2021
Finanstilsynet søger økonom til krisehåndtering
København
10-05-2021

Mere fra ØU Formue

Seneste nyt

Aktuel artikelserie

Tax Governance

Virksomhedernes skattebetalinger er under stigende offentlig bevågenhed. En række spektakulære sager om skatteunddragelse har intensiveret offentlighedens opmærksomhed på ...

Andre artikelserier

Tax Governance
Den Danske Pensionssektor
Dansk Forsikringsmafia?
ESG & A.P. Møller-Mærsk
ESG investeringer og analyser
KlimaBarometer for Dansk Økonomi

Seneste nyt

Mest læste

Få dit daglige nyhedsoverblik i din indbakke

Seneste rapporter fra eksterne rådgivere

Dybdegående og original 
journalistik siden 1994

Økonomisk Ugebrev har i mere end 25 år leveret indsigtsfuld og dagsordensættende journalistik og analyser til læserne og den brede offentlighed. 

Vi tager ansvar for vores indhold og er tilmeldt:

OM ØU

Log ind

KONTAKT

Telefonisk henvendelse: 70 23 40 10
Telefonerne er åbne alle hverdage fra: 10-15
Salgschef: Sidsel Bogh

Skriv til os på: kontakt@ugebrev.dk.
Vi bestræber os på at besvare henvendelser indenfor 24 timer.

Økonomisk Ugebrev A/S
CVR-nr.: 31760623
Forbindelsesvej 12, 2. tv
2100 København Ø

Log ind

Har du ikke allerede en bruger? Opret dig her.

Analyse af og prognoser for Fixed Income (statsrenter)

Direkte adgang til opdaterede analyser fra toneangivende finanshuse:

Goldman Sachs

Fidelity

Danske Bank

Morgan Stanley

ABN Amro

Jyske Bank

UBS

SEB

Natixis

Handelsbanken

Merril Lynch 

Analyse og prognoser for kort rente, samt for centralbankernes politikker

Links:

RBC

Capital Economics

Yardeni – Central Bank Balance Sheet 

Investing.com: FED Watch Monitor Tool

Nordea

Scotiabank

 

Log ind

[iteras-paywall-login paywallid="qwerty123"]