Annonce

Log ud Log ind
Log ud Log ind
Ledelse

US: Fauci sår igen tvivl om oprindelse af Corona-virus: Kommer den fra et laboratorium?

Morten W. Langer

mandag 24. maj 2021 kl. 11:10

Fra Zerohedge:

Earlier this month, just hours after Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) dragged Anthony Fauci over pandemic misinformation – and the fact that Fauci’s NIH funded risky collaborations at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – the nation’s top virologist (and highest-paid government employee) furiously backpedaled over the origins of the pandemic in what we can only assume was an effort to redirect attention from his own culpability.

Recall that since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, Fauci parroted CCP talking points – insisting that the virus couldn’t possibly have come from a Chinese lab.

h/t @QTRResearch

Yet, hours after Rand Paul’s grilling – Fauci suddenly changed his tune during an afternoon Poynter event on “United Facts of America: A Festival of Fact-Checking,” according to the Fox News.

When asked by Katie Sanders of Politifact if he was still confident that COVID-19 developed naturally, Fauci responded: “No actually. “I am not convinced about that, I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened.”

“Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals, but it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favor of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus,” he added, nervously.

Watch below – and notice how Fauci gets upset that Paul brought up NIH funding – while misdirecting with the false argument nobody is making that the NGO he funded, EcoHealth Alliance, participated in the creation of COVID-19.

As we noted in March, Fauci’s NIH “funded a number of projects that involved WIV scientists, including much of the Wuhan lab’s work with bat coronaviruses. While in 2017, Fauci’s agency resumed funding a controversial grant without the approval of a government oversight body, according to the Daily Caller.

For context, in 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Four months prior to that decision, Fauci’s NIH effectively shifted this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) via a grant to nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak.

Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance

The NIH’s first $666,442 installment of EcoHealth’s $3.7 million grant was paid in June 2014, with similar annual payments through May 2019 under the “Understanding The Risk Of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” project.

Notably, the WIV “had openly participated in gain-of-function research in partnership with U.S. universities and institutions” for years under the leadership of Dr. Shi ‘Batwoman’ Zhengli, according to the Washington Post‘s Josh Rogin.

And now, Fauci, who funded EcoHealth, is suddenly putting his hands in the air and playing innocent over the whole thing.

Tilmeld dig vores gratis nyhedsbrev
ØU Bestyrelsesguiden

Få de vigtigste nyheder om praktisk bestyrelsesarbejde, ledelse og strategi i SMV.
Udkommer hver onsdag.

Jeg giver samtykke til, at I sender mig mails med de seneste historier fra Økonomisk Ugebrev. Lejlighedsvis må I gerne sende mig gode tilbud og information om events. Samtidig accepterer jeg ØU’s Privatlivspolitik.

Du kan til enhver tid afmelde dig med et enkelt klik.

[postviewcount]

Jobannoncer

CEO for Rejsekort & Rejseplan A/S
Region H
Controller/økonomimedarbejder – få den brede vifte af økonomiopgaver
Region H
Finance/Business Controller til Anzet A/S
Region Sjælland
Liftra ApS i Aalborg søger en Finance Controller med ”speciale” i Transfer Pricing
Region Nordjylland

Mere fra ØU Ledelse

Log ind

Har du ikke allerede en bruger? Opret dig her.

*Tilbuddet gælder ikke, hvis man har været abonnent indenfor de seneste 6 måneder

Tilmeld dig vores nyhedsbrev

Og modtag ØU’s rapport om Top 40 Ledelseskonsulenter gratis.

FÅ VORES STORE NYTÅRSUDGAVE AF FORMUE

Her er de 10 bedste aktier i 2022

Tilbuddet udløber om:
dage
timer
min.
sek.

Analyse af og prognoser for Fixed Income (statsrenter og realkreditrenter)

Direkte adgang til opdaterede analyser fra toneangivende finanshuse:

Goldman Sachs

Fidelity

Danske Bank

Morgan Stanley

ABN Amro

Jyske Bank

UBS

SEB

Natixis

Handelsbanken

Merril Lynch 

Direkte adgang til realkreditinstitutternes renteprognoser:

Nykredit

Realkredit Danmark

Nordea

Analyse og prognoser for kort rente, samt for centralbankernes politikker

Links:

RBC

Capital Economics

Yardeni – Central Bank Balance Sheet 

Investing.com: FED Watch Monitor Tool

Nordea

Scotiabank